Lessons
-
Introduction
-
Search engine optimization
- Broken links
- Site map
- Micro-markup
- Robots.txt
- References
- Text
- Duplicates
- Basic
- Pictures
-
Speed
-
Minification
-
CSS minification
Minification of JavaScript files
Minification of inline CSS code
Minification of images without loss of quality
Minification of JavaScript files
Unused CSS code
Data optimization:Image URLs
Format of animated images
Unused JavaScript code
Using WebP
Image compression is missing
Video bitrate
-
Reducing requests
-
An overabundance of small pictures
Ungrouped CSS files
Ungrouped JavaScript files
An overabundance of fonts
Availability of end-to-end CSS, JS files
The presence of a monochrome font
Uploading duplicate files
Using JS facades
Redirecting JavaScript code
Adding lazy loading
Redirect from/to www version
- Fonts
- Loading time
- Server Settings
- Pictures
- The first content
-
Minification
- Mobility
- Bugs
-
Convenience
- Social networks
- Web Application Manifest
- Favicons
- Basic
- Text readability
-
Security
- Encrypted connection
- Exploits
- Vulnerabilities
Using WebP
The WebP format has absorbed all the best from JPEG and PNG. It can specify the compression ratio of the image from 0 to 100, and it supports transparency. Moreover, the compression algorithm is often more efficient than JPEG.
The only disadvantage of this format is that it is not supported by operating systems by default. That is, users will not be able to download to their computer and open the file in WebP format. To do this, they will need to install additional software.
For JPEG and PNG formats, it is better to specify the compression quality of 90. It is better to save GIF images without compression.
Any comments or additions? Send us an email admin@site-alarm.com .
Check your website